The petitioner was answerable for his very own predicament. If your petitioner was dissatisfied with the judgment during the accommodate, he should have used the legal proper of charm instead of forfeiting that solution and resorting to some belated application below Part 151, C. A lawyer specialising in family legislation https://best-lawyer-in-dha-karach29042.onzeblog.com/32186520/corporate-lawyer-in-karachi-fundamentals-explained